Thanks Sean, Alex. I understand the rationale now. On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Alex Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Friday, July 15, 2016 at 2:27:56 PM UTC-5, Atamert Ölçgen wrote: >> >> >> I can't think of a single use case where this function would be useful. I >> would either inline true instead of a function call, or I would supply >> (constantly true) if a function is expected. >> >> I am sure it wouldn't be included in core if there wasn't a valid reason. >> Could you tell me what is this function good for? >> > > It's useful for defining specs. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Kind Regards, Atamert Ölçgen ◻◼◻ ◻◻◼ ◼◼◼ www.muhuk.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
