Ambrose, does that "iterate" result arise from chunking? "iterate" is advertised as producing an infinite lazy sequence. While a suddenly chunking "iterate" will no doubt smoke out some cases like this, doesn't it seem that they are abuses? It's not quite spot-on to employ "take" or "take-while" outside the "iterate" as a loop-ending nanny for sequences that could not genuinely be infinite. The "take" should be concerned with what the consumer wants to consume, not preoccupied with what the producer will be able to produce.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
