Thanks for the extra analysis. My feeling was that it would be possible, but I wasn't sure.
Luckily my current use cases don't depend on keeping UUIDs secret, but I was still wondering if there was a trade off. A mention in the docs seems worthwhile. Cheers > On 4 Mar 2015, at 21:40, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Also, if someone were given another time based UUID to use as a basis of > comparison, they could eliminate 47 more bits of randomness to guess at. So, > I think you make a good point that I think will be worthwhile to mention in > my documentation. Thank you. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
