2014-07-08 18:20 GMT+02:00 Marko Kocić <[email protected]>:

> Clojure doesn't have lazy evaluation because it is a "few" years younger
> and didn't want to repeat Haskell's mistake. Even Simon Payton Jones, the
> creator of Haskel, confessed that, if he would make Haskel again, he would
> make it strict, and not lazy, but that it's too late to change it.
>
> --
>

Sorry for offtopic, but, you have source of it?

Andrey


> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Andrey Antukh - Андрей Антух - <[email protected]> / <[email protected]
>
http://www.niwi.be <http://www.niwi.be/page/about/>
https://github.com/niwibe

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to