On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Gregg Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Atamert Ölçgen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Gregg Reynolds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Atamert Ölçgen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Define rational. To me, it looks like absence of a choice of law >>> clause means I have no idea where I might end up in case of litigation. >>> Name your favorite corrupt legal system here. With a choice of law clause >>> at least you can be somewhat confident that the contract can be enforced >>> under some semblance of the rule of law. >>> >> >> >> Are you saying the corrupt judges of the corrupt legal system will act >> differently just because you have chosen a license with a choice of law >> clause that's referring to the law in effect at other side of the planet? >> > > Oh good grief don't be ridiculous. I'm saying pick the jurisdiction you > think most likely to deliver lawful governance. I don't care which side of > the planet or which planet. > What I meant to say, is "good grief, don't be ridiculous - I've got that covered. Tough job, but somebody's got to do it!" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
