This works for all cases were I transform the matrix using map, but I also
transform it using reverse and assoc.
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 8:02:03 PM UTC-4, Jason Ozias wrote:
>
> Take a look at mapv. If you aren't dealing with lazy sequence, it'll map
> the function across and convert the output to a vector.
>
> On Thursday, May 8, 2014 7:28:47 PM UTC-4, Joseph Rollins wrote:
>>
>> I am confused about the best way to assure that I am dealing with a
>> vector when dealing with core library functions that often return seq where
>> I then lose my ability to access it using associative accesses (get-in
>> specifically).
>>
>> My particular use case is as follows:
>>
>> I am modeling a matrix as nested vectors
>>
>> [[0 0 0] [0 1 1] [0 1 1]]
>>
>> represents
>>
>> 0 0 0
>> 0 1 1
>> 0 1 1
>>
>> I know matrix libraries exist, but for the sake of learning am rolling my
>> own functionality. I have several functions that operate on this:
>>
>> (defn transpose [piece]
>> (apply mapv vector piece))
>>
>> (defn translate-block
>> ([mm] (let [one? #(if (= 1 %) true false)]
>> (translate-block mm one?)))
>> ([mm f] (map #(map f %) mm)))
>>
>> (defn rotate-left [b]
>> (->> b
>> transpose
>> reverse))
>>
>> The problem I am running into is that these do not output nested vectors,
>> but nested seqs (due to all of the map operations). I am using these
>> matrices to program Tetris, and I am writing a function that takes a Tetris
>> block, a Tetris board (both represented as matrices) and a position of the
>> block inside the board. The function is supposed to determine if the
>> placement of the block is valid (not overlapping already placed blocks:
>>
>> (defn is-valid?
>> "Determine if a game state is valid (is current piece place-able)."
>> [{board :board {:keys [piece pos]} :piece}]
>> (let [[x y] pos
>> coords (for [rows (range (count piece))
>> cols (range (count (first piece)))]
>> [[rows cols] [(+ y rows) (+ x cols)]])]
>> (map (fn [[c cc]]
>> (and (get-in board cc) (get-in piece c)))
>> coords)))
>>
>> The matrices hold true and false values for if occupied. When testing
>> this function I realized get-in was just returning nil because it wouldnt
>> get in a seq (non-associative). What is the best way to assure that when I
>> need associative guarantees that they haven't been thrown away through
>> previous transformations of the board or piece matrices?
>>
>> The two choices I see are making sure every function that operates on the
>> matrices explicitly outputs nested vectors again, or transforming the input
>> to functions that need the guarantees to nested vectors explicitly. Am I
>> missing something here, or, if not, what is the idiomatic way to solve this
>> problem?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Joseph
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
