Yes I agree, that was my next thought. I wish we could do these knobs in a single JVM.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote: > > that closely match or can be massaged to match or 'have sympathy' for the > > hardware realities. I think this can get lost when we stray too far. > > i wish this were somehow more modeled, composed, and controllable up > in our ides and source code, rather than being esoteric tweaky options > in the various inscrutable layers. i want a futuristic JIT that does > this kind of stuff for me :-) :-) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
