On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 13:15:33 -0800 (PST) Andy Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> but > my question is really about the more general case of any function > that manipulates a vector e.g. the following also returns a list > rather than a vector as desired, In Clojure you rarely have to worry about types. All the data-structures fall under a common set of abstractions and in particular the ISeq interface. Strictly speaking map returns a seq not a list. In fact a lazy seq...this is by design so further operations can be applied lazily later...if you use eager operations like mapv exclusively you lose the ability to aggregate operations without cost. hope that clarifies it... Jim -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
