I think it looks interesting because it seems like maintaining the Clojure semantics is what also gives a lot of the cljs<->js interop problems. It seems like there would be room for a variant of ClojureScript which maintains as much of the semantics as possible without compromising performance or interop too much. I haven't actually played with ClojureScript much - to what extent do people think this is possible?
On 25 May 2013 21:40, David Nolen <[email protected]> wrote: > It's another interesting Lisp variant to JavaScript compiler but besides a > surface like similarity, it doesn't really preserve many of Clojure's > semantics (keyword behavior, data structures, immutability, notion of > truth, protocols, multimethods, etc). > > David > > > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Rich Morin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I saw mention of Wisp the other day (on Hacker News, IIRC), but I >> haven't noticed any discussion of it on the Clojure email list, >> (def newsletter), etc: >> >> Wisp is a homoiconic JavaScript dialect with clojure syntax, >> s-expressions and macros. Unlike clojurescript, Wisp code >> compiles to human-readable JavaScript. The goal of Wisp is >> to compile to the JavaScript you would have written anyway. >> Think of Wisp asmarkdown for JS programing! >> >> Homoiconic syntax and macros are the primary motivations! >> >> -- https://github.com/Gozala/wisp >> >> See also http://jeditoolkit.com/try-wisp/ >> >> Has anyone here played with Wisp? Any reactions? >> >> -r >> >> -- >> http://www.cfcl.com/rdm Rich Morin >> http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume [email protected] >> http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/weblog +1 650-873-7841 >> >> Software system design, development, and documentation >> >> >> -- >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
