2013/2/13 Jim Klucar <[email protected]> > This is mostly because I didn't want to think of something clever. At any > rate I'd like to know if that naming convention would be frowned upon > because it isn't coming from the official clojure dev group. >
clj-* is a much more popular naming scheme. It is more important to namespace your code, use an artifact group and make it dead easy for beginners to get started by putting together a useful README file than it is to name your project perfectly. -- MK http://github.com/michaelklishin http://twitter.com/michaelklishin -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
