Hello Stuart,

Thank you for your prompt reply.

> It would be nice if the "Documentation" link in the left-side column 
could expand into a list of sub-sections, but I don't know if the 
technology behind the site (Wikispaces) can support that right now.

That would be very nice, indeed. The software used before the change showed 
all sub-sections.
Thank you for trying to show them again. Good luck with it!

> felt that the site was getting cluttered with too many links, which was 
confusing to newcomers.

I agree, that cluttering up a site is bad and confusing. On the other hand 
I think, nothing is more clarifying, i.e. deconfusing, than documentation.
So finding and navigating through it should be as easy and fast as possible.

I know that the following is a minority opinion: But this attention to 
newcomers is, albeit very honourable and of course economically necessary, 
bad.
There is no easy path to anything that has depth. It is the duty of an 
apprentice to work hard to get what he desires. It is not the duty of the 
beauty,
clojure in this case, to attract. Beauty generates attraction all by itself.

As clojure does.

Thanks again !

Heinz. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to