deja-vu :) On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:16 PM, JvJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On a side note, I was partially inspired by Haskell's do notation, which > is imperative-looking syntactic sugar for monadic bind operators. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- I may be wrong or incomplete. Please express any corrections / additions, they are encouraged and appreciated. At least one entity is bound to be transformed if you do ;) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
