On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, JvJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not sure if anyone's done this before, but I'm fed up with writing
> code that looks like this:
>
What problem does this solve given you can do the following?
(let [a 1
_ (println a)
b 2
_ (println b)
c 3
_ (println c)]
...)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
