dotted pairs and cons in Scheme and CL both allow you specify an improper
tail. This has some historical utility if you are using cons as a way to
build up non-list data structures. Scheme and CL both provide better
facilities for data structures than using cons.

As far as I know lists are just conses with proper tails.

David

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:03 PM, octopusgrabbus
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Thanks for answering. I am taking from your answer that I can be
> Lisp/Clojure-esque in Scheme and not worry about dotted pairs. That is, I
> can make a grid out of lists, rather than using cons to construct them.
> That's what I'm trying to do.
>
>
> On Saturday, June 16, 2012 11:35:14 AM UTC-4, octopusgrabbus wrote:
>>
>> I have a need to learn enough scheme to read it and write a few
>> functions. I came across dotted pair notation. I am trying to grok it in
>> terms of the only Lisp I know, Clojure. Does dotted pair notation in Scheme
>> compare to  form in Clojure, and if so, how?
>>
>>
>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to