No, core.logic is not the answer here; numerical stuff is currently out of reach.
On Saturday, 26 May 2012 03:25:22 UTC+1, jlk wrote: > > Hi Zack > > I don't really know enough about core.logic to comment on this. Brent > mentions symbolic math and it sounds neat but I'm more interested in > numerical solutions at the moment. > > Cheers > > > On Saturday, May 26, 2012 10:45:09 AM UTC+10, Brent Millare wrote: >> >> I originally assumed core.logic would be the key to symbolic math, but >> now I feel that's not really the case. You still need to implement all the >> algebra manipulation algorithms as usual. One can define the numbers in a >> different way as Ambrose did in his talk, but I imagine we would need to >> have much different performance expectations when performing the other >> symbolic operations. That being said, I would like to see more work going >> into that type of implementation. >> >> On Thursday, May 24, 2012 8:37:57 PM UTC-4, Zack Maril wrote: >>> >>> Off topic: >>> How hard would it be to build on >>> core.logic<https://github.com/clojure/core.logic#corelogic>to do math >>> functions? >>> -Zack >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
