On Apr 28, 9:32 pm, Armando Blancas <[email protected]> wrote: > Seems like the expansion is trying to put the function's value in there, > and this has already been compiled. If the function' code is expanded > in-place it works.
True. Thanks for confirming this. Shantanu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
