Stuart Sierra <[email protected]> writes: > I haven't looked at that code in a long time, but the answer is yes. Each > Hadoop "Job" runs in its own JVM process.
Thank you. That makes sense, then. Just to nail it home, though, do you agree that this patching technique is generally /not/ tenable in programs that need to use several instances of a such a class, each with different configuration? I think we'd either need another layer of indirection in the method dispatch, or instead use a class-generating macro that demands that configuration at macroexpansion time, creating a distinct class for each. -- Steven E. Harris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
