Yes, it is incorrect, in both Clojure and ClojureScript, to repeat the
(:require ...) or (:use ...) forms in an `ns` declaration.
-S
On Monday, March 5, 2012 12:26:03 PM UTC-5, Aaron wrote:
>
> It seems that when I require two namespaces in a namespace definition,
> the clojurescript compiler misses the first require. I have a module
> that has a ns definition more or less like the following:
>
> (ns my-namespace
> (:require [lib1 :as l1])
> (:require [lib2 :as l2]))
>
> Using clojurescript master (53ecf3cd3a), the compiled javascript for
> the above definition is:
>
> goog.provide('my-namespace');
> goog.require('cljs.core');
> goog.require('lib2');
>
> The compiler misses the first require. If I switch the definition
> around so that it reads like this:
>
> (ns my-namespace
> (:require [lib2 :as l2])
> (:require [lib1 :as l1]))
>
> again, the compiler misses the first require and the output looks like
> this:
>
> goog.provide('my-namespace');
> goog.require('cljs.core');
> goog.require('lib1');
>
> However, if I just write:
> (ns my-namespace
> (:require [lib2 :as l2]
> [lib1 :as l1]))
>
> the javascript output references both libraries just fine. Is it just
> wrong to use multiple requires in clojurescript, or is this really a
> bug? If there is a general convention that must be followed then it
> would be good to document it because as a relative new-comer, it took
> me a while to find a workaround.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
