I'd suggest that it's a continuum not a dichotomy, but one convenient place to draw an arbitrary line is whether you think it sane and sensible to use debugging facilities designed for the target language or whether you view that as akin to debugging a c program by inspecting the disassembly.
(of course, if your view is that debugging a c program is *per se* not sane or sensible, that analogy is of course not a good one) On Feb 27, 2012 6:48 PM, "David Nolen" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Raju Bitter <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> How about "ClojureScript is a little language that compiles into >> >> JavaScript"? ;) >> > >> > >> > Well, ClojureScript is not little the way that CoffeeScript is - >> > ClojureScript comes with cljs.core. >> >> Exactly, ClojureScript has it's own semantics instead of just being >> syntactic sugar. > > > Well, CoffeeScript has it own semantics as well - scope, class syntax, > expression oriented come to mind. > > David > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
