On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Alan Malloy <[email protected]> wrote: > (def separate (juxt filter remove)).
Cute, but that makes giving it a docstring, pre- and postconditions, and similar things a pain. > It's in old-contrib, I think in clojure.contrib.seq-utils or > something. Obviously not recommended for use in new programs. I wouldn't consider it to be "a standard library function" then. What comes with the language implementation, and so is clearly "standard library", is clojure.core, clojure.set, clojure.io, etc.; even the modular new-contrib IMO doesn't quite qualify. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
