do you mean syntax sugar = macro ? On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:48 PM, James Reeves <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 29 December 2011 16:35, Louis Yu Lu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Agree on looking from the angle of data structure and their internal > > presentation. But conceptually, [] and {} are just syntax sugars: > > [x y] -> (vector x y) > > {x y} -> (hash-map x y) > > #{x y} -> (hash-set x y) > > Well, no, not really. > > It's true that (vector x y) evaluates to [x y], but that's not syntax > sugar, any more than (+ 1 1) is syntax sugar for 2. > > - James > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
