On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:35 AM, dmiller <[email protected]> wrote: > An analysis of the 2011 ClojureCLR survey and a plan of action is now > available here: > > http://clojureclr.blogspot.com/2011/11/survey-says-call-to-action.html
Nice set of analyses David - great work! On this one: http://clojureclr.blogspot.com/2011/11/survey-says-port-those-libs.html I wonder if we neet to consider a parallel set of contribs for ClojureCLR that match clojure.java.*? That would seem to help with interop and ecosystem which are two other points on the survey. clojure.net.* is likely to be open to misinterpretation, I suspect, so clojure.clr.* would seem more logical? I don't know enough about .NET / CLR to help (although I'm curious) but I suspect a "port" of clojure.java.jdbc to clojure.clr.ado or something similar would be useful? -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
