Thanks, the bootstraping and performance explanations both make sense. I guess questions like that arise because Clojure tries to accomodate both the Java type system and its own, and sometimes there is tension between the two...
On Oct 11, 11:01 pm, Stuart Sierra <[email protected]> wrote: > Nope, the core interfaces were written before Protocols existed. Making them > protocols is a bootstrapping problem, although ClojureScript shows that it > may be possible to fix this. > > If you want to make a Java class seqable, you'll have to wrap it in another > type that you create. > > -Stuart Sierra > clojure.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
