This means I can read the rest of the logs http://clojure-log.n01se.net/date/2008-09-03.html and it stills hold up ? i.e we want tagged numbers ?
/Kevin On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Aaron Bedra <[email protected]> wrote: > That's correct. That is why Clojure/core hasn't prioritized this work. > > Cheers, > > Aaron Bedra > -- > Clojure/core > http://clojure.com > > On 08/25/2011 08:37 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer (kotarak) wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Disclaimer: I have no clue whatsoever about the low-level JVM stuff. >> >> I remember Rich saying in one of his talks/interviews, that invokedynamic >> is not very interesting for Clojure and that Clojure won't really benefit >> from it. I'm far from understanding these things. So details on what's >> improved would be very interesting, I guess. >> >> Sincerely >> Meikel >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
