On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:54 PM, HiHeelHottie <[email protected]> wrote:
> Completely agree with you that it shouldn't automatically map out of
> the box. As a newbie to clojure and jdbc, do you have any advice on
> how I can get into resultset-seq* to do the mapping? I think it would
> be better not to have to map a BigDecimal to double after resultset-
> seq* returns a row.
Apply something like this to the result?
(map (fn [row] (into {} (map (fn [[k v]] [k (some-mapping v)]) row))) results)
> Are there any future plans to add a mapping api to resultset-seq or is
> the pattern just to chain any custom mappings after resultset-seq?
Currently no plans. I don't want to add the overhead of map-over-map
for all users when I suspect only a few would want / need such a
mapping.
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/
Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/
"Perfection is the enemy of the good."
-- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
