Lee Spector <[email protected]> wrote: > >On May 19, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Korny Sietsma wrote: > >> Experienced developers (who are likely to grok clojure) probably >already use one of ant / rake / maven / sbt etc. > >"Experienced with what?" is the question. Those coming from the Lisp >world, who are likely both to grok and to be ready to love Clojure, >won't necessarily know anything about those tools.
Ditto for experience platform developers where the platform in question isn't the JVM. >> Even the IDE users probably understand the need to dip into the >command-line for things like building deployable artifacts. > >The need for the dip isn't the issue, IMHO, it's what you fall into >when you dip -- that is, it's the complexity of what you have to dip >into, how easy it is to figure out if it's all new to you, how much >guidance is provided, etc. This all actually ties back to my complaint that "Simple things aren't simple." Working on a web problem set is a "simple thing". Getting to a point where you can do that with Clojure isn't. -- Sent from my Android tablet with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
