Hi again, On 8 Apr., 14:45, Meikel Brandmeyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't believe it is idiomatic to overload + in such a way. (No > matter how to access the original one.) That is if you want to (+ 1 2) still to be 3. Of course you can the *replace* +. That's perfectly ok. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
