On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Shantanu Kumar
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I noticed that in 'with-open' macro the .close() method is called
> without wrapping in another try-catch block. Exceptions raised in the
> finally block prevails over the exception raised in the try block. Is
> this intended behavior or I am missing something?
>
> Is there an alternative where the exceptions raised due to
> invoking .close() can be ignored?
>
Why not do:
(with-open [reader (Reader.)]
(try
...
(catch)
)
Rather than putting the try outside the with-open?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
