yea true, I guess it is harmless though .. but a bug nevertheless... On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:06 PM, John Szakmeister <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Sunil S Nandihalli > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > when we give an empty vector of seq-exprs to doseq it returns the value > of > > the last s-expression.. but returns nil when the > > vector-of-seq-exprs is not empty.. may be this is the expected behaviour > .. > > but the documentation states otherwise .. > > Yeah, that looks like a bug (either in the documentation or the code): > (doseq [] 1) => 1 > > -John > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<clojure%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
