2011/1/18 Ken Wesson <[email protected]> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Chas Emerick <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Any tone you might have picked up from Laurent might be a reaction to > your ranting about how ccw is apparently rubbish rather than asking for > help. > > Well, excuuuuse me for assuming,
Another day, less tired than today, another attempt. [OT] Ken, out of topic question: are you aware of the impact of the way you "write things" ? It's quite strange how you avoid the topic when people directly mention it. And it's also strange how at the same time, you reinforce the problem by using a writing style with emphasis on "complaining", "ranting", etc. : the 4 "u" in "excuuuuse me" being a good example of what I'm trying to explain. [/OT] Now back to business. Ken, the "raw content" of your feedback report on installing and trying Counterclockwise has been noted, and I certainly intend to pick ideas in it for future releases of CCW. In the mean time, there's a question you did not explicitly answer to: was there an implicit question in your email, beyond its "informative" nature ? Last question: would it be possible for you to try write your posts in a less emotional/sarcastic/condescendent way ? Because it's really counter productive and does not serve well neither the point you're trying to make, neither the feelings of the recipient(s) of your mail. Cheers, -- Laurent > quite reasonably, that if, after an > install and restart during which no error messages appeared and > subsequent to which "create new Clojure project" had appeared in the > application menus, a feature, that if it existed should obviously be > prominently featured in certain right-click menus, was not there, then > it had not been implemented. :) > > > Tangentially, IMO it'd be nice if tooling troubleshooting discussions > didn't hit this list at all, since there are presumably mailing lists and > other forums specific to each toolset. > > Your email is the first place that I encountered the url for any forum > specific to CCW. Notably, this means that no such url showed up at any > point during the process of obtaining, installing, and attempting to > use CCW. Troubleshooting discussions for CCW might show up here less > frequently if the existence, nevermind the location, of the list you > mentioned was more apparent to new users. :) > > (And, of course, let's not forget that this didn't actually start as a > troubleshooting discussion. As far as I was aware CCW was working > properly but simply did not have (easy access to) certain > functionality that I had expected. So I was reviewing a > product/starting a feature-request discussion, not starting a > troubleshooting discussion, as far as I knew at the time.) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<clojure%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
