On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Alyssa Kwan <[email protected]> wrote: > What things "normally mean" has no place in computer science. You > have to embrace the jargon to be able to think rationally in the > space. This in no way detracts from this discussion.
I meant what things "normally mean" in computer science. :) Maybe it's good if Hickey is able to rewrite the books on computer science; but in the meantime we are left with some terminological impedance mismatches between "Hickey nomenclature" and more typical comp sci nomenclature. That's not a value judgment; it's just a statement of fact. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
