> (apply
> merge-with
> conj
> {}
> (for [nd d nd-pair nd face nd-pair]
> {face nd}))
I like to use into for cases like this:
(into {} (for [nd d nd-pair nd face nd-pair] [face nd]))
seems clearer to me.
g
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
