Would it be correct to say that the namespace portions of keywords are semantically opaque?
In other words, if I have a keyword :my-ns/foo and a symbol 'my-ns/foo, obviously the namespace in the symbol has semantic meaning to the language when it's evaluated (or syntax-quoted), but the namespace of the keyword does not appear carry that meaning, almost as if they are in two separate "meta-namespaces". Is that pretty much guaranteed as far as the language is concerned? I'm asking because I've become the latest in the line of Clojurians to go tilting at the "SXML-in-Clojure" windmill, and if I decide use the namespace portion of a keyword (for example :xsl/value-of) I want to be certain it's always distinct in meaning from any Clojure namespaces or aliases of the same name. The code I teased apart into this library currently uses keywords like :xsl:value-of to distinguish XML namespaces from Clojure namespaces, just as a matter of "that was the first thing I thought of", but it would certainly be saner to stop wasting effort splitting them apart by hand with string munging and simply bestow my own meaning on the keywords' namespaces if the language itself doesn't give them any meaning. Thanks, -Kyle -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
