I see. It's hard to imagine how this could work, since macros don't
have access to runtime data like the value of x in your example.
Perhaps you're better off writing a function that returns a closure,
and iteratively def'ing those?
user=> (defn make-kw-fn [kw]
#(= kw %))
#'user/make-kw-fn
user=>
(def kws [:a :b])
#'user/kws
user=>
(eval (cons 'do (map #(list 'def (symbol (str "test-" (name %))) (make-
kw-fn %)) kws)))
#'user/test-b
user=> (test-b :a)
false
user=> (test-b :b)
true
On Sep 10, 1:37 pm, icemaze <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alan, thank you for your reply.
> Unfortunately your solution is very similar to mine and it suffers
> from the same problem (maybe I'm using it incorrectly, I don't know).
> If I write:
>
> (doseq [x '(:a :b)]
> (make-fn x))
>
> it defines a single function "synthetic-x". Is there a way to make
> this work? I tried everything but both eval and var-get don't work for
> local bindings.
>
> Thanks again.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
