On Jul 10, 12:16 am, Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-googlegroups. [email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 12:49:05 -0700 (PDT) > > j-g-faustus <[email protected]> wrote: > > That said, I would leap at a chance to shorten Java names, even if it > > were just to chop off the leading "com" or "org". > > As the owner of mired.org, but not of mired.com (and I don't know the > registered owner) or .net, or of that domain in any other TLD, I'd have > to call that the worst suggestion so far. > But the chances of mired.com bringing out a library called 'proclog' are insignificant. As mentioned before in this discussion, TLDs change owners anyway so the TLD convention can't be used to definitively identify an owner. The aim of the convention is to reduce the chances of library names clashing.
As another suggestion how about clj.handle.library e.g clj.mired.proclog clj.weavejester.compojure clj.acme-corp.dynamite This separates the clojure namespace from the java one, doesn't tie to a TLD and reduces the chances of collisions at the library level. Also, somebody mentioned dropping api/core from the core namespace in a library. Personally, I'd be happy with that. Saul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
