Hi A., I dont completely understand what you refer to with "works correct".
You define a local variable, named do, and use it. That works of course. Btw you may use it without the call to var (def do println) (do "example") In let you may do (let [do println] (do :plop)) Is this what you want? (I'm driven to point out that this is bad style - but you probably know already.) Regards, alux On 30 Mai, 19:07, "A.Rost" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > For example, it's possible to do things like: > (def do println) > ((var do) "example") > > And it works correct. But I don't understand how to get the same > behavior in let bindings. > I mean > (let [do println] > ......) > what can I write to get the same results? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
