On 26 May 2010 23:09, Eric Schulte <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark Engelberg <[email protected]> writes: > >> If you're developing a trio, like ltrim, trim, rtrim, wouldn't it be >> better to call them triml, trim, trimr so that they show up next to >> each other in the alphabetized documentation? > > +1 for modifiers at the end > > Let's not forget those of us who search for functions using > tab-completion in the repl.
And those who search forlornly in http://bit.ly/bPRHP1 trimX makes sense on those grounds, given the rate of expansion of clojure. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
