This is how I would write it:
(doseq [[main fixed] (map vector mainTables fixedTables)]
(println "Setting up table")
(doto fixed
(.setAutoCreateColumnsFromModel false)
(.setModel (.getModel main))
(.setSelectionModel (.getSelectionModel main))
(.setFocusable false))
(let [column (.getColumn (.getColumnModel main) 0)]
(println column)
(.removeColumn (.getColumnModel main) column)
(.addColumn (.getColumnModel fixed) column)))
(println mainTables)
(println fixedTables)
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Josh Stratton <[email protected]>wrote:
> Here's an example of trying to use "map" to bring the two tables
> together together in the same scope. I'm doing this because the nth
> element in one sequence correlates to its nth counterpart in the
> second sequence. mainTables is a sequence of JTables and fixedTables
> is an equally sized sequence of JTables. For some reason though it
> appears that setupTable is never being called. Why is that? Is there
> a better way to do this?
>
> (defn setupTable [main fixed]
> (println "Setting up table")
> (doto fixed
> (.setAutoCreateColumnsFromModel false)
> (.setModel (.getModel main))
> (.setSelectionModel (.getSelectionModel main))
> (.setFocusable false))
>
> ; remove the first column from the main table and add it to
> the
> fixed table
> (let [column (.getColumn (.getColumnModel main) 0)]
> (println column)
> (.removeColumn (.getColumnModel main) column)
> (.addColumn (.getColumnModel fixed) column)
> )
> )
>
> (map (fn [main fixed] (setupTable main fixed)) mainTables
> fixedTables)
> (println mainTables)
> (println fixedTables)
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Josh Stratton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> It sounds like the doseq is the macro you're looking for, e.g.
> >> (doseq [c my-components]
> >> (.setVisible c true))
> >
> > That works once I've done the initial mapping and I want to set
> > values, but what if I still want the two components--the old and new
> > one--in the same scope at the same time?
> >
> > In python, one might do something like this:
> >
> > for i,component in oldComponents:
> > newComponents[i].setValue(oldComponents[i])
> > if (oldComponents[i].getAttribute() > 5):
> > newComponents[i].setAttribute(0)
> > else:
> > newComponents[i].setAttribute(1)
> >
> > I guess I was just trying to avoid using index notation. Would zip be
> > the appropriate solution here, where I can set the two lists together
> > in tuples of old and new?
> >
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
