On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Peter T <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am just curious what the rationale is behind the implicit do. > > ja, personally i find the implicit do's in Clojure or begin's in > Schemes to be kinda bad, sort of along the lines of what you say. i > feel like there's all this talk about how functional means you don't > have to explicitly order things, and then boom they go and give you > implicit ordering of things. oh well. and i never am totally sure > which forms do/not implicitly have it. oh well. > I think pretty well covered here: http://clojure.org/special_forms. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
