Hi.
> And gives very different results. 'for' iterates over it's sequences
> in a nested fasion. For your particular example, it will return the
> sequence from (+ 31 1) (+ 31 2) and so on, and never get to the second
> element of the first vector.
I like it. I was recently wondering about a convenient expression
for this type of iteration. I wonder if it could be supported
with a new keyword in for?
maybe:
(for [ x [42 17 25]
:with [ y (iterate inc 1)]]
(+ x y))
Unfortunately I have no suggestions for an implementation, but it would
complement all the syntactical niceties already offered by for.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
