> Runs (in a nice constant memory) even though yours (which almost > appears equivalent) will not!
i am thinking ever more that less than stupendously overt syntax for laziness is too risky cf. Haskell and Clojure. sincerely. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
