Good point. I'll be careful to use the term vector in the future, and array for java interop only.
On Jul 8, 12:30 pm, Laurent PETIT <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/7/8 Sean Devlin <[email protected]>: > > > > > Laurent, > > > I don't quite understand your point. Could you please explain it a > > little more? > > Oh, I wanted to be quick. > > I think using the term "array" instead of "vector" (which is the real > term used for datastructure created by a [:a :b :c :d] form) may be > confusing (one could overlook and understand "java array"). > > see:http://clojure.org/data_structures#toc15 > > and from (http://clojure.org/reader): > "Vectors > Vectors are zero or more forms enclosed in square brackets: > [1 2 3] > " > > Regards, > > -- > Laurent > > > > > Thanks > > > On Jul 8, 12:16 pm, Laurent PETIT <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2009/7/8 Sean Devlin <[email protected]>: > > >> > This seems like a good use for a macro. A couple of thoughts: > > >> > 1. Use arrays instead of lists > >> > In clojure, it is "best practice" to use arrays for data. So, your > >> > macro call should look like this. > > >> > (match [1 2 3] > >> > [1 x] (+ x x) > >> > [1 x y] (+ x y)) > > >> Hi, > > >> s/array/vector/g > > >> Regards, > > >> -- > >> Laurent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
