I'm glad I was helpful. You can try this approach first, and see if it meets your requirements. If it's still too slow you can drop down to loop/recur to eliminate the boxing overhead at the expense of some extra verbosity. -Patrick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- breaking early from a "tight loop" prhlava
- Re: breaking early from a "tight loop" CuppoJava
- Re: breaking early from a "tight loop" joshua-choi
- Re: breaking early from a "tight loop"... J. McConnell
- Re: breaking early from a "tight loop&... joshua-choi
- Re: breaking early from a "tight loop" prhlava
- Re: breaking early from a "tight loop"... CuppoJava
- Re: breaking early from a "tight loop&... Laurent PETIT
- Re: breaking early from a "tight ... CuppoJava
- Re: breaking early from a "ti... Laurent PETIT
- Re: breaking early from a &quo... James Reeves
- Re: breaking early from a &quo... Laurent PETIT
- Re: breaking early from a &quo... James Reeves
- Re: breaking early from a &quo... CuppoJava
- Re: breaking early from a &quo... Laurent PETIT
- Re: breaking early from a &quo... Laurent PETIT
- Re: breaking early from a &quo... Max Suica
