Cool! Rather then waiting, you could host it in the interim on GitHub or
Google Code so people like myself can submit patches (which I'm more than
willing to do) ;) Just a thought...
A couple of things:
(println
(javascript (var x)))
I would expect this to convert to:
var x;
It does not.
(println
(javascript (new Object {prop1 "a" prop2 "b"})))
> var MyClass = new(ClassGenerator, {prop1:"a",prop2:"b"});
Instead of ,
var MyClass = new ClassGenerator({prop1:"a", prop2:"b"});
This idiom is essential to MooTools, a JS library I use quite a bit.
The other thought that I had was how to use macros with js-gen? The
javascript macro pretty much captures everything and doesn't allow macros to
be embedded. Seems like this would be quite handy.
I've been contemplating writing a system which generates tagged javascript
so that it can be sanely debugged if generated server side via Clojure.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:07 AM, jim <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'll be glad to support it if people choose to use it and report
> issues. My plans to use are still on my todo list, things just keep
> getting put on top of them. One of which is to get my own server set
> up to host this and some other projects.
>
> I'll check out those asserts and make them so they're not dependent on
> order. Have you seen anything else that needs to be fixed?
>
> Thanks
> Jim
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
