Thanks for the feedback everyone! Kev
On Apr 1, 11:38 pm, Rayne <[email protected]> wrote: > comp seems more appropriate here. > > On Mar 31, 11:52 pm, kkw <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > I have some code where I wanted to: > > - take a list of stuff (which includes another list inside) > > - use 'seq-utils/flatten' to flatten the list > > - use 'interpose' to add comma-delimiting strings between the elements > > - print out the results, thereby creating comma-delimited output > > > I may choose between: > > > ((comp > > (fn [x] (apply println x)) > > (fn [x] (interpose ", " x)) > > seq-utils/flatten) > > mr) > > > OR > > > (-> mr > > seq-utils/flatten > > ((fn [x] (interpose ", " x))) > > ((fn [x] (apply println x)))) > > > And I found the "->" notation marginally easier to interpret and > > understand. Apart from appearance, are there any benefits to using -> > > instead of the comp function? I happily concede that there exist nicer > > ways to achieve this goal, but the question I wanted to raise > > concerned the benefits of using -> vs comp or vice-versa. > > > Kev > > > Kev --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
