I'm interested in the answer to whether it is just an accident of implementation or if there is some compelling reason for the global registry.
I'm still new to Clojure and it would be good to hear the tradeoffs and design process that led to the current implementation. On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm a bit surprised by this. It seems that the use of the global registry > limits spec to development use cases. Is that intentional? Maybe I'm > worried over nothing > > > On Saturday, June 10, 2017 at 11:04:17 AM UTC-7, Alex Miller wrote: >> >> We don't have any plans at the moment to support anything but the global >> registry. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
