I think the “reducible streams” approach described by Paul Stadig here <http://paul.stadig.name/2016/08/reducible-streams.html> has potential. It might not cover all of the scenarios you’re thinking of, though.
On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 1:35:48 PM UTC-4, Brian Craft wrote: > > The with-open style is used a lot in the jdbc lib, and elsewhere. It's > pretty simple when data is very small, as you can just evaluate the entire > result with doall, etc. > > How do you deal with larger data, where you need to evaluate iteratively? > If there's only one with-open it can be reasonably simple to pass the > consumer into that context (though from ring it's pretty convoluted, due to > needing to pass control to ring first). But if there are multiple with-open > you have to nest them, with a continuation passing style, or middleware > pattern, or something, which quickly becomes onerous as it affects all the > code surrounding the with-open. > > Is there some simpler pattern? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
