Re: clojure.contrib.repl-ln vs. new lazy

[Stephen C. Gilardi]

On Feb 17, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:

This line looks important:

                at clojure.core$generate_class__5435.invoke(genclass.clj:219)   

Turning on nil punning debugging with:

        cd clojure
        ant -Dclojure.assert-if-lazy-seq=true

and testing with:

        user=> (compile 'clojure.contrib.repl-ln)

suggests that genclass.clj could use some lazy love.

--Steve

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature