On Jan 14, 2:27 pm, "Mark Engelberg" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I also find the choice of some/not-any? as opposites to be hard to > remember. I'd rather it be some/not-some? or any/not-any? I think some and any? both have their place. (let [foo (some prime? numseq)] (do something with foo)) (if (any? composite? numseq) ; we haven't finished factorising That is hastily made-up pseudocode, of course. The point it: 'any? looks like a predicate, as it should. 'some doesn't, so it's a nuisance when it is used as a predicate. Personally, I'd prefer 'some be called 'find or 'find-first, but I'm not arguing in favour of that; that's simply a preference. Gavin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
