I'm still not sure how you are printing these backtraces.
For example, if I do:
user=> (use 'clj-backtrace.repl)
user=> ("foo")
user=> (.printStackTrace *e)
It prints the normal Java backtrace. If instead I do:
user=> (use 'clj-backtrace.repl)
user=> ("foo")
user=> (pst)
It prints the cleaned backtrace. Could you provide REPL sessions like
these that indicate the unexpected behavior?
- Mark
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Konrad Hinsen
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 03.01.2009, at 15:46, Mark McGranaghan wrote:
>
>> Thanks for trying the library, I'm glad you found it useful. It should
>> not redefine any existing behaviour - could you share a REPL session
>> showing the behavior that seemed to change?
>
> Nothing except what the library is supposed to do: clean up the
> backtrace printouts. I am wondering how a simple (use) can change the
> way the backtrace is printed.
>
> Konrad.
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
